OM
Generate Remittance Advice
Payment and Reporting
Description
The Generate Remittance Advice business process describes the activity of preparing remittance advice/encounter Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) transactions that providers use to reconcile their accounts receivables. This business process begins with receipt of information resulting from the Process Claim business process, performing required manipulation according to business rules and formatting the results into the required output information that process sends to Send Outbound Transaction.
Business Process Template
Trigger events
Environment-based
None published
Interaction-based
- Receive the claims information from the Process Claim business process.
Results
- Alert to send to provider Accredited Standards Committee (ASC) X12 835 Health Care Claim Payment/Advice transaction.
- Tracking information as needed for measuring performance and business activity monitoring.
Business process steps
- 1. START: Receive claims information from the Process Claim business process.
- 2. Perform required information manipulation according to business rules, including the reporting of any edit or audit errors that resulted in denials or modifications of payment from the reimbursement amount submitted on the claim, e.g., bundling or unbundling of services.
- 3. Generate remittance advice transaction.
- 4. Send alert to send to provider ASC X12 835 Health Care Claim Payment/Remittance Advice transactions.
- 5. END: If applicable, receive alert from receiver via ASC X12 TA1 Interchange Acknowledgment, 997 Functional Acknowledgment, 999 Implementation Acknowledgment, and/or the 824 Application Advice transaction(s) per Trading Partner Agreement (TPA).
Predecessor processes
Successor processes
- Send Outbound Transaction
- Manage Data
Shared data
- Provider data store including provider network and contract information
- Claims data store including payment information
Constraints
Remittance Advice-Encounter Reports conforms to the format and content in accordance with federal and state-specific reporting requirements, e.g., using HIPAA Transaction Standard Companion Guide that may differ based on situational fields determined by state policy.
Failures
- Unresolved conflicts in the reported details in the remittance advice.
Performance measures
- Time to complete the process: e.g., Real Time response = within __ seconds, Batch Response = within __ hours
- Accuracy with which remittance advice/encounter report rules are applied = ___%
- Error rate = __% or less
Source: CMS MITA 3.0 Business Process Template, Operations Management BPT.pdf, pages 1-2.
Business Capability Model (10 questions)
Each capability question defines five maturity levels, from Level 1 through Level 5.
Business Capability Descriptions
Is the process primarily manual or automatic?
- LEVEL 1The process consists primarily of manual paper-based activity to accomplish tasks. Remittance Advice uses SMA specific format and data content and a mix of manual and automatic processes
- LEVEL 2SMA uses a mix of manual and automatic processes to accomplish tasks. SMA continues to provide paper RAs to some providers.
- LEVEL 3SMA automates process to the full extent possible within the intrastate. All Providers and encounter submitters receive electronic transactions with some exceptions.
- LEVEL 4SMA automates process to the full extent possible across the interstate.
- LEVEL 5SMA automates process to the full extent possible across the nation.
Does the State Medicaid Agency use standards in the process?
- LEVEL 1SMA focuses on meeting compliance thresholds for state and federal regulations using state-specific standards.
- LEVEL 2SMA applies a mix of HIPAA and state-specific standards
- LEVEL 3SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards, and other nationally recognized standards for intrastate exchange of information.
- LEVEL 4SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards, and other nationally recognized standards for clinical and interstate information exchange.
- LEVEL 5SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards, and other nationally recognized standards for national exchange of information.
How does the State Medicaid Agency collaborate with other agencies or entities in performing the process?
- LEVEL 1Very little collaboration occurs with other agencies to standardize information exchange or business tasks.
- LEVEL 2SMA collaborates with other agencies and entities to adopt HIPAA standards and Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) transactions.
- LEVEL 3SMA collaborates with other intrastate agencies and entities to adopt national standards, and to develop and share reusable business services.
- LEVEL 4SMA collaborates with other interstate agencies and entities to adopt national standards, and to develop and share reusable processes including clinical information.
- LEVEL 5SMA collaborates with agencies and entities for national (and international) interoperability improvements that maximize automation of routine operations.
Business Capability Quality: Timeliness of Process
How timely is the end-to-end process?
- LEVEL 1Process meets threshold or mandated requirements for timeliness (i.e., the process achieves results within the time specified by law or regulation).
- LEVEL 2Process timeliness improves through use of automation. Timeliness exceeds legal requirements
- LEVEL 3Timeliness improves via state and federal collaboration, use of information sharing, standards, and regional information exchange hubs. Timeliness exceeds Level 2.
- LEVEL 4Information is available in near real time. Processes that use clinical information result in immediate action, response, and results. SMA has interstate interoperability, which further improves timeliness over Level 3.
- LEVEL 5Information is available in real time. Processes improve further through connectivity with other States and with federal agencies. Most processes execute at the point of service. Results are almost immediate.
Business Capability Quality: Data Access and Accuracy
How accurate is the information in the process?
- LEVEL 1Use of direct data entry for information collection is manually intensive and susceptible to inconsistent or incorrect information. Stakeholders are unable to rely on information for decision-making.
- LEVEL 2HIPAA standard transactions improve accuracy of information but the decision-making process may be erroneous or misleading. Accuracy is higher than at Level 1
- LEVEL 3Automation of information collection increases the reliability of SMA’s internal information. External sources of information use MITA Framework and industry standards for information exchange. Decision-making is automatic using standardized business rules definitions. Accuracy rating is at 99% or higher.
- LEVEL 4Automation of information collection increases the reliability of SMA’s internal and external sources of information. SMA adopts MITA Framework and industry standards for information exchange with interstate agencies. Decision-making is automatic using regional standardized business rules definitions. Accuracy rating is at 99% or higher.
- LEVEL 5SMA adopts MITA Framework and industry standards for information exchange with national agencies. Decision-making is automatic using national standardized business rules definitions. Accuracy rating is at 99% or higher.
How accessible is the information in the process?
- LEVEL 1SMA stores information in disparate systems including paper storage and obtains information manually.
- LEVEL 2SMA stores information in disparate systems, but automation and HIPAA standards increase accessibility over Level 1.
- LEVEL 3SMA obtains information easily and exchanges with intrastate agencies and entities based on MITA Framework and industry standards. Accessibility is greater than Level 2.
- LEVEL 4SMA obtains information easily and exchanges with interstate agencies and entities. Accessibility is greater than Level 3.
- LEVEL 5SMA obtains information easily and exchanges with national agencies and entities. Accessibility is greater than Level 4.
Business Capability Quality: Cost Effectiveness
What is the cost of the process compared to the benefits of its results?
- LEVEL 1High relative cost due to low number of automatic, standardized tasks.
- LEVEL 2Automation improves process and allows focus on exception resolution, improving cost effectiveness ratio over Level 1
- LEVEL 3SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards, and other nationally recognized standards further improving cost effectiveness ratio over Level 2.
- LEVEL 4SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards, and other nationally recognized standards for interstate information exchange. SMA increases cost effectiveness ratio over Level 3.
- LEVEL 5SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards, and other nationally recognized standards for national (and international) information exchange. SMA increases cost effectiveness ratio over level 4.
Business Capability Quality: Effort to Perform; Efficiency
How efficient is the process?
- LEVEL 1Process is labor intensive. There is wasted effort or expense to accomplish tasks. Process meets minimum state process guidelines and SMA performance standards. Efficiency is low.
- LEVEL 2Automation and state standards increase productivity. Efficiency is higher than Level 1.
- LEVEL 3SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with intrastate agencies and entities improving efficiency to 95% or higher.
- LEVEL 4SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with interstate agencies and entities improving efficiency to 98% or higher.
- LEVEL 5SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with national agencies and entities improving efficiency to 98% or higher.
Business Capability Quality: Accuracy of Process Results
How accurate are the results of the process?
- LEVEL 1Manual processes result in greater opportunity for human error. Accuracy is low.
- LEVEL 2Automation and standardized business rules definitions reduce error and improve accuracy above Level 1
- LEVEL 3SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with intrastate agencies and entities improving accuracy to 90% or higher.
- LEVEL 4SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with interstate agencies and entities improving accuracy to 98% or higher.
- LEVEL 5SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with national agencies and entities improving accuracy to 98% or higher.
Business Capability Quality: Utility or Value to Stakeholders
Does the business process satisfy stakeholders?
- LEVEL 1Stakeholders lack confidence in information negatively affecting stakeholder satisfaction with the process.
- LEVEL 2Automation and standardization provides clear and useful information. Stakeholder satisfaction is greater than Level 1.
- LEVEL 3SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with intrastate agencies and entities improving stakeholder satisfaction to 90% or higher. SMA uses survey or questionnaire for information collection.
- LEVEL 4SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with interstate agencies and entities improving stakeholder satisfaction to 95% or higher.
- LEVEL 5SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with national agencies and entities improving stakeholder satisfaction to 98% or higher.
Source: CMS MITA 3.0 Business Capability Model, Operations Management BCM.pdf, pages 1-6.