MES Certification Navigator
FM

Generate Financial Report

Fiscal Management

Description

It is essential for the State Medicaid Agency (SMA) to be able to generate various financial and program analysis reports to assist with budgetary controls and to ensure that the established benefits and programs are meeting the needs of the member population and are performing according to the intent of the legislative laws or federal reporting requirements. The Generate Financial Report business process begins with a request for information or a timetable for scheduled correspondence. The business process includes: • Defining the report attributes (e.g., format, content, frequency, media, and retention). • Defining the state and federal budget categories of service, eligibility codes, provider types, and specialties (taxonomy). • Extracting required financial information from source data stores. • Transforming information to meet business and technical needs of target destination. • Applying necessary encryption algorithms for security. • Sending alert with information to the target destination. NOTE: This business process does not include maintaining the benefits, reference, or program information. Maintenance of the health plan, health benefits, and reference information is in separate business processes.

Business Process Template

Trigger events
Environment-based
  • Request to generate on-demand report on financial and/or program information.
  • Periodic timetable (e.g., daily, weekly, quarterly) is due for financial reporting.
Interaction-based

None published

Results
  • The on-demand or scheduled generation of a financial report.
  • The financial and program analysis report set sent to the Send Outbound Transaction.
  • Generation of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) specific reports such as the following: o CHIP Program Budget Report (CMS-21B) o Medicaid Program Budget Report (CMS-37) o Quarterly CHIP Statement of Expenditures (CMS-21) o Quarterly Expense Report (CMS-64)
  • Tracking information as needed for measuring performance and business activity monitoring.
Business process steps
  • 1. START: Receive request for generation of financial report.
  • 2. Agency logs the request.
  • 3. Define required report(s) format, content, frequency, media for the reports, and its retention period.
  • 4. Define data elements necessary to produce the report (e.g., state and federal budget categories of service, eligibility codes, taxonomy codes).
  • 5. Extract required information from source data stores.
  • 6. If applicable, transform information to meet business and technical needs of target destination.
  • 7. If applicable, apply necessary encryption algorithms for security.
  • 8. Agency logs the response.
  • 9. If applicable, send the report to the Send Outbound Transaction for delivery to target destination.
  • 10. END: Review financial report for analysis or distribution.
Successor processes
Shared data
  • Financial data store including accounts receivable, accounts payable, Recovery
  • Audit Contractor (RAC) recoveries, and budget information
  • Claims data store including payment information
  • Member data store including demographics information
  • Provider data store including provider network information
  • Reference data store including code set information
Constraints

The generation of financial and program analysis reports will adhere to state-specific or federal laws, regulations, and requirements. These rules will differ by state.

Failures
  • Information is unavailable to generate the report.
Performance measures
  • Time to complete process: e.g., Real Time response = within __ seconds, Batch Response = within __ hours
  • Accuracy of decisions
  • Consistency of decisions and disposition = ___%
  • Error rate = __% or less

Source: CMS MITA 3.0 Business Process Template, Financial Management BPT.pdf, pages 39-41.

Business Capability Model (10 questions)

Each capability question defines five maturity levels, from Level 1 through Level 5.

Business Capability Descriptions

Is the process primarily manual or automatic?
  1. LEVEL 1The process consists primarily of manual paper-based activity to accomplish tasks.
  2. LEVEL 2SMA uses a mix of manual and automatic processes to accomplish tasks.
  3. LEVEL 3SMA automates process to the full extent possible within the intrastate.
  4. LEVEL 4SMA automates process to the full extent possible across the interstate.
  5. LEVEL 5SMA automates process to the full extent possible across the nation.
Does the State Medicaid Agency use standards in the process?
  1. LEVEL 1SMA focuses on meeting compliance thresholds for state and federal regulations using state-specific standards.
  2. LEVEL 2SMA applies a mix of HIPAA and state-specific standards.
  3. LEVEL 3SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards, and other nationally recognized standards for intrastate exchange of information.
  4. LEVEL 4SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards, and other nationally recognized standards for clinical and interstate information exchange.
  5. LEVEL 5SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards, and other nationally recognized standards for national exchange of information.
How does the State Medicaid Agency collaborate with other agencies or entities in performing the process?
  1. LEVEL 1Very little collaboration occurs with other agencies to standardize information exchange or business tasks.
  2. LEVEL 2SMA collaborates with other agencies and entities to adopt HIPAA standards and Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) transactions.
  3. LEVEL 3SMA collaborates with other intrastate agencies and entities to adopt national standards, and to develop and share reusable business services.
  4. LEVEL 4SMA collaborates with other interstate agencies and entities to adopt national standards, and to develop and share reusable processes including clinical information.
  5. LEVEL 5SMA collaborates with agencies and entities for national (and international) interoperability improvements that maximize automation of routine operations.

Business Capability Quality: Timeliness of Process

How timely is the end-to-end process?
  1. LEVEL 1Process meets threshold or mandated requirements for timeliness (i.e., the process achieves results within the time specified by law or regulation).
  2. LEVEL 2Process timeliness improves through use of automation. Timeliness exceeds legal requirements.
  3. LEVEL 3Timeliness improves via state and federal collaboration, use of information sharing, standards, and regional information exchange hubs. Timeliness exceeds Level 2. The generation of the financial report generally takes less than one (1) business day.
  4. LEVEL 4Information is available in near real time. SMA has interstate interoperability, which further improves timeliness over Level 3.
  5. LEVEL 5Information is available in real time. Processes improve further through connectivity with other States and with federal agencies. Most processes execute at the point of service. Results are almost immediate.

Business Capability Quality: Data Access and Accuracy

How accurate is the information in the process?
  1. LEVEL 1Use of direct data entry for information collection is manually intensive and susceptible to inconsistent or incorrect information. Stakeholders are unable to rely on information for decision-making.
  2. LEVEL 2HIPAA standard transactions improve accuracy of information but the decision-making process may be erroneous or misleading. Accuracy is higher than at Level 1.
  3. LEVEL 3Automation of information collection increases the reliability of SMA’s internal information. External sources of information use MITA Framework and industry standards for information exchange. Decision-making is automatic using standardized business rules definitions. Accuracy rating is at 99% or higher.
  4. LEVEL 4Automation of information collection increases the reliability of SMA’s internal and external sources of information. SMA adopts MITA Framework and industry standards for information exchange with interstate agencies. Decision-making is automatic using regional standardized business rules definitions. Accuracy rating is at 99% or higher.
  5. LEVEL 5SMA adopts MITA Framework and industry standards for information exchange with national agencies. Decision-making is automatic using national standardized business rules definitions. Accuracy rating is at 99% or higher.
How accessible is the information in the process?
  1. LEVEL 1SMA stores information in disparate systems including paper storage and obtains information manually.
  2. LEVEL 2SMA stores information in disparate systems, but automation and nationally recognized standards increase accessibility over Level 1.
  3. LEVEL 3SMA obtains information easily and exchanges with intrastate agencies and entities based on MITA Framework and industry standards. Accessibility is greater than Level 2.
  4. LEVEL 4SMA obtains information easily and exchanges with interstate agencies and entities. Accessibility is greater than Level 3.
  5. LEVEL 5SMA obtains information easily and exchanges with national agencies and entities. Accessibility is greater than Level 4.

Business Capability Quality: Cost Effectiveness

What is the cost of the process compared to the benefits of its results?
  1. LEVEL 1High relative cost due to low number of automatic, standardized tasks.
  2. LEVEL 2Automation improves process and allows focus on exception resolution, improving cost effectiveness ratio over Level 1.
  3. LEVEL 3SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards, and other nationally recognized standards further improving cost effectiveness ratio over Level 2.
  4. LEVEL 4SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards, and other nationally recognized standards for interstate information exchange. SMA increases cost effectiveness ratio over Level 3.
  5. LEVEL 5SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards, and other nationally recognized standards for national (and international) information exchange. SMA increases cost effectiveness ratio over level 4.

Business Capability Quality: Effort to Perform; Efficiency

How efficient is the process?
  1. LEVEL 1Process is labor intensive. There is wasted effort or expense to accomplish tasks. Process meets minimum state process guidelines and SMA performance standards. Efficiency is low.
  2. LEVEL 2Automation and state standards increase productivity. Efficiency is higher than Level 1.
  3. LEVEL 3SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with intrastate agencies and entities improving efficiency to 95% or higher.
  4. LEVEL 4SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with interstate agencies and entities improving efficiency to 98% or higher.
  5. LEVEL 5SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with national agencies and entities improving efficiency to 98% or higher.

Business Capability Quality: Accuracy of Process Results

How accurate are the results of the process?
  1. LEVEL 1Manual processes result in greater opportunity for human error. Accuracy is low.
  2. LEVEL 2Automation and standardized business rules definitions reduce error and improve accuracy above Level 1.
  3. LEVEL 3SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with intrastate agencies and entities improving accuracy to 90% or higher.
  4. LEVEL 4SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with interstate agencies and entities improving accuracy to 98% or higher.
  5. LEVEL 5SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with national agencies and entities improving accuracy to 98% or higher.

Business Capability Quality: Utility or Value to Stakeholders

Does the business process satisfy stakeholders?
  1. LEVEL 1Stakeholders lack confidence in information negatively affecting stakeholder satisfaction with the process.
  2. LEVEL 2Automation and standardization provides clear and useful information. Stakeholder satisfaction is greater than Level 1.
  3. LEVEL 3SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with intrastate agencies and entities improving stakeholder satisfaction to 90% or higher. SMA uses survey or questionnaire for information collection.
  4. LEVEL 4SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with interstate agencies and entities improving stakeholder satisfaction to 95% or higher.
  5. LEVEL 5SMA adopts MITA Framework, industry standards and information exchange with national agencies and entities improving stakeholder satisfaction to 98% or higher.

Source: CMS MITA 3.0 Business Capability Model, Financial Management BCM.pdf, pages 111-116.

Other Financial Management processes